In March 2019, tensions erupted between the European Union and Malaysia, after the European Commission concluded that palm oil cultivation was causing excessive deforestation and that its use as fuel should stop by 2030. Malaysia, the world‘s second-largest palm oil producer after Indonesia, depends on the harvest to generate billions of dollars in foreign exchange earnings and hundreds of thousands of jobs. Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad said the European Union‘s increasingly hostile attitude towards palm oil was an attempt to protect alternatives produced by Europe itself, such as rapeseed oil. He claimed that the European Union risked launching a trade war with Malaysia because of its “grossly unfair” policy of reducing the use of palm oil, which Mahathir considers “unfair” and an example of “rich people”. Trying to impoverish the poor. [5] Two external studies were conducted, i.e. a quantitative study based on a general model of predictable equilibrium focusing on the effects of liberalization and a qualitative study that examined in detail non-tariff and regulatory issues related to trade in goods, services and investment. The EU was Malaysia‘s third largest trading partner in 2016, after China and Singapore. In 2016, trade with the EU increased by 0.4% to .RM 149.1 billion. “Brexit has little impact on trade between the EU and Malaysia” “In terms of trade policy, we also found that Malaysia is now a bit cautious; Before that, it was very open and secure at the regional level in the areas of free trade, open trade and rules-based trade.
Eu Free Trade Agreement Malaysia
In March 2019, tensions erupted between the European Union and Malaysia, after the European Commission concluded that palm oil cultivation was causing excessive deforestation and that its use as fuel should stop by 2030. Malaysia, the world‘s second-largest palm oil producer after Indonesia, depends on the harvest to generate billions of dollars in foreign exchange […]