Treasury Board Ec Collective Agreement

2. We should start with the basic premise that the employ­er has the right to obtain a med­ical cer­tifi­cate as a pre­con­di­tion for grant­i­ng sick leave. In most col­lec­tive agree­ments, the employer‘s right to impose such a require­ment is explic­it. If a col­lec­tive agree­ment remains silent on this point, the employ­er could suc­cess­ful­ly argue that […]

2. We should start with the basic premise that the employ­er has the right to obtain a med­ical cer­tifi­cate as a pre­con­di­tion for grant­i­ng sick leave. In most col­lec­tive agree­ments, the employer‘s right to impose such a require­ment is explic­it. If a col­lec­tive agree­ment remains silent on this point, the employ­er could suc­cess­ful­ly argue that its remain­ing man­age­ment rights (i.e. all rights that have not been mod­i­fied by the lan­guage of the col­lec­tive agree­ment) allow it to require proof of ill­ness. If a col­lec­tive agree­ment stip­u­lates (as some do) that the employ­er can only require a med­ical cer­tifi­cate after as many days of absence in a giv­en year, the employer‘s right would be lim­it­ed. The lat­est EC col­lec­tive agree­ment con­tains updat­ed pro­vi­sions con­cern­ing: 19. A med­ical cer­tifi­cate from a doc­tor may be accept­ed by the employ­er. This appears to be the case in prac­tice, with changes in cer­ti­fi­ca­tion and health­care pro­vi­sion. The work includes legal assis­tance in cas­es of low com­plex­i­ty /file/project, which requires the orga­ni­za­tion and pro­cess­ing of files/files/projects that are often sub­ject to time con­straints. This may include the prepa­ra­tion of legal doc­u­ments, the receipt of tes­ti­monies, the analy­sis or eval­u­a­tion of claims, the review of leg­is­la­tion or the col­lec­tion of fines, the devel­op­ment of set­tle­ment agree­ments and the rela­tion­ship between the parties.

cases/files/projects are rou­tine and prece­dents are avail­able; How­ev­er, the work has room to mod­i­fy and adapt approach­es. The work includes research, analy­sis, analy­sis and inter­pre­ta­tion of case law, claims, con­tracts and auton­o­my agree­ments, guide­lines and pro­ce­dures, as well as under­stand­ing the nature, pri­or­i­ty, impact and valid­i­ty of claims, posi­tions, alter­na­tives and con­clu­sions for­mu­lat­ed by oth­er par­ties at the nego­ti­at­ing table in a cer­tain 1994 geog­ra­phy, 1994, 1994, 1994. 

INGEN KOMMENTARER

Kommentarfeltet til denne artikkelen er nå stengt. Ta kontakt med redaksjonen dersom du har synspunkter på artikkelen.

til toppen